The REAL Dirt on Organic Church

June 25, 2010

in General Simple Church

By Neil Cole

In the Spring 2010 issue of Leadership Journal, Brian Hofmeister shares his disappointing experience with organic church in an article called The Dirt on Organic. A couple things seem apparent from the article. Hofmeister did not try organic for very long, perhaps only a year or so, and he took the expectations of the institutional expression of church with him into the work, so his experience is less than a full trial.

Having written the books Organic Church, Organic Leadership and Church 3.0, I know that there is dirt on the organic church, but Hofmeister’s minimal experience didn’t really get a chance to unearth it. Perhaps you want to hear the real dirt on organic church from someone who actually has worked through the principles and practices for a couple decades now. Let me oblige. The dirt is deep under all my nails and the stench of fertilizer is all over my clothes.

Here are a couple of things about organic church that you may want to know before you try it. Let the reader beware; organic church is not something every leader should attempt.

Organic Church Hurts More

Doing church relationally and starting in the harvest fields is one of the most rewarding and at the same time discouraging experiences of my life.

I remember back when I used to pastor a “real” church I would read the verses when Paul would mention how he wept with his prayers every day for the churches and frankly, I would feel guilty that I didn’t have such passion for my own church… until I started the first Awakening Chapels.

When you usher a new life into the kingdom of God, baptize them into obedience to their new Lord and disciple them in their first steps of faith, they become your spiritual children. John explains to us that he has no greater joy than to hear of his children walking in truth. When you see a young church where just weeks before there was only darkness and evil, you feel a far greater sense of joy and responsibility, much like a parent. When your disciples fall away it hurts more than if you simply have an empty seat in your auditorium on Sunday morning for a couple weeks. It feels as though one of your own children has fallen away, because they have. This explains Paul’s passion when he said, “Besides everything else, I face daily the pressure of my concern for all the churches. Who is weak, and I do not feel weak? Who is led into sin, and I do not inwardly burn?” (2 Cor. 11:28-29) In the context, Paul just finished talking about beatings, multiple scourgings, shipwrecks and even suffering execution, but these things seem to pale compared to the pain he felt when his own spiritual children fell back into sin. I have felt that pain myself and it is deep and sticks with you for a long time, perhaps for your entire life.

That pain never leaves you and can give you pause to keep on going, but the rewards of new life that stays faithful is enough to keep me at it. I can never go back to the way I used to do church, no matter how painful it can be in the present manner. I know too much and have been ruined for regular church forever. Discipling people and investing in provenness rather than potential does help to reduce this pain some, but not entirely. Paul had Demas and Jesus had Judas and you will have some people who deeply hurt you with a kiss on the cheek. So I am willing to endure the pain. I willingly count the cost and pay the price for doing church organically.

Organic Church is More Messy

Mistakes and foolishness are more evident in organic church where your experience is unscripted and spontaneous. You are often taking great risk and on occasion the risk pays off well. When you choose to do church organically you intentionally release control and that means you have to live with the results that grow out of the soil of broken lives. We call this “organic panic” for those who are just beginning to see how messy life can be when it is organic rather than organizational.

For many of us we desire spontaneous multiplication of disciples, leaders, churches and movements. You simply cannot have something scripted and spontaneous at the same time, so control must be given up. Your hope for order is faith in the actual DNA that is planted in the seeds of transformed lives. I have been to churches where every single minute is accounted for with a detailed and well-rehearsed script. This may produce a wonderful show but it does not allow for anything spontaneous. If you want the church to grow and multiply spontaneously, you have to allow for spontaneity. How can God lead us if we have no place for Him in our schedule of church life?

Often the beautiful fruit that grows out of the dirt of organic church surprises me; but sometimes I shake my head with wonder at what God is willing to endure in people’s lives. Sometimes my church is a beautiful bride full of life and hope; at other times it more resembles the island of misfit toys, all broken and forgotten by the world. I’ve stopped feeling responsible for other people’s decisions when I grant them freedom of choice, but I still cringe on some occasions. In my opinion, the best leaders are not those who draw the largest crowds but those that produce other leaders. A good leader who is developing other leaders simply must allow apprentices to try new things, even silly ones, and make mistakes or they are not empowered. If excellence and perfect timing is your desire, you may want to stay away from the spontaneous organic ways of doing church and instead maintain a scripted performance as core to your church experience. But do not be surprised if you find that you are not producing leaders but simply consuming ones already developed by others. This is part of the problem Mr. Hofmeister was wrestling with; he was feeling unprepared without already formed leadership in place. Organic panic seized him and he let go of the opportunity he had.

If you are unwilling to let people make some mistakes, even theological ones, than you are forfeiting any real original thinking and conformity to what has been is all you will be left with. If that is your desire, stay away from organic church. I let people make mistakes and learn from them and I believe that in the long run the results are better people, not worse ones. We may not have an excellent production once a week, but we have long-term fruitfulness. People learn from mistakes, if you eliminate the mistakes you also eliminate the learning.

Organic Church Has Less Applause

When multiplication is your desire the work simply must begin small and slow. There is no other way to go. I believe it is for this reason, more than any other, that true multiplication is forfeited by most Christian leaders on the altar of quick success. We so easily shift from the long-term fruit of multiplication so that we can have larger numbers faster with addition. Driven by our own insecurities and need for admiration and respect, we start doing things that attract more attention and invest less in reproduction.

Jesus often turned away from the glow of the multitudes to invest instead in a small band that could do the same. When he rose to heaven after three very productive years of exceptional ministry, He left behind 120 disciples. (He must’ve missed the “How to break the 200 barrier seminar.”) He could have easily left with far more applause, but His goal was to incite a movement, not attract an audience. His plan eventually did what no earthly army could ever do—overcome and defeat the mighty Roman Empire. This result, however, would not occur in his lifetime or the lifetime of any of his own disciples. The exponential momentum of a multiplication movement is eventually unstoppable and rapid, but it doesn’t start that way. It builds with the life and death of each new generation.

Criticism is also a reality for the pioneers battling in the organic fields today. In real war, they call this “friendly fire,” but there is nothing friendly about it. To be out ahead facing the conflict with our enemy head on and get shot from behind by people who are supposed to be on your own team is harsh, especially when you realize that the armor provided by our Lord only seems to cover your front leaving your backside uncovered.

If you are someone who needs the approval of others for your own sense of well being, organic church is not for you. Hate mail is common for me, but strangely enough it is often sent to the address of many other people before mine. It seems that people often make public accusations without even approaching me first. Thick skin is a mandatory requirement for those who are blazing new trails in organic church life, and not every leader is made for this stuff.

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

Paul Richard June 27, 2010 at 7:56 am

I read both Neil Cole’s article and Brian Hofmeister’s. I am grateful for the honesty of both who are seeking a viable expression of being the Church. I have to agree with Neil that it appears Brian carried the traditional church paradigm into the experiment. I have recently begun this journey away from the institutional church – Can I be a follower of Jesus without this form of the church? I am still discovering my own fears and uncertainties about this. But Brian’s struggle with leadership is an area in the organic/missional church is one I also am struggling to understand. What does work here? When I say, “There must be someone leading this thing,” it feels like I am stuck in the traditional church paradigm. Is all this structuring really what Jesus meant when he talked about building his Church? I honestly do not know, but I would like to hear from those of you who have done this longer. What does leadership look like in this setting and should there even be a leader? As Jesus said, new wine needs new wineskins. We want something different, but it feels like we are trying to use the old, safe, predictable structures to bring it about. But when you try to let go of those, what do you hold onto instead?

Reply

Galen Currah July 2, 2010 at 6:03 am

‘Organic’ leadership looks something like 2 Timothy 2:2. A beautiful illustration appears in the Epistle to the Colossians: Paul supporting Timothy (1:1), supporting Epiphras (1:7), supporting Archippus, supporting Lydia, as they provided pastoral care to new churches in Derbe, Ephesus, Colossae, Laodecia, Hieropolis. One leads more through mentoring that empowers than through executive power. Strangely, in the NT, church leaders have no special authority, only responsibility to make others successful.

Reply

Mitsuo July 21, 2010 at 4:50 pm

Thank you, Neil. Your article reminded me of the following verse: “Without oxen a stable stays clean, but you need a strong ox for a large harvest.” (Proverbs 14:4)

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: